Seniors deserve to age with dignity in their own homes.  Exemption applies only to a primary residence and to anyone domiciled in CA for 10 years or who has occupied their home for at least 5 years. At least one individual on the title must be 60+ to qualify for the exemption.

16 states have launched property tax reform. Together, let's get California going!

We Cannot Do This Without Your Support
You can mail a check (suggested amount $100+) to:
California Property Tax Exemption CA2026 
4950 Hamilton Avenue, Suite 108
San Jose CA 95129
(Make the check out to California Property Tax Exemption CA2026)

Funding is the lifeblood of any successful campaign — without it, momentum stalls: We need funding to conduct outreach across California's 58 counties, which is expensive. Printing petitions, flyers, banners, and covering social media expenses across California adds up quickly. Grassroots movements like ours rely on supporters stepping up at critical moments. Please contribute and support us.

​*Please consider making a one-time contribution of $1,000 to support this campaign. When we win, you could save hundreds of thousands of dollars in property taxes over the lifetime of owning your home.

CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTION
Suggested $50 contribution
Use your credit card here

The Three Steps to Sign the Petition
​(Have a printed copy on hand to begin and watch the video below)

Mail the completed petition packets to:
California Property Tax Exemption CA2026
2010 N. 1st Street, Ste 470,
San Jose 95131
Please read the complete instructions "How to Sign the Petition" below before you begin the process

---

Click Each Tab Below to Learn More

• POST ON NEXTDOOR 
• HOW TO SIGN THE PETITION
• COLLECTING SIGNATURES 
• FAQ
• IN THE NEWS

<

>

Post this Message on Nextdoor/ Whatsapp/ WeChat
​
SUBJECT: A major property tax exemption initiative is coming to the November 2026 ballot
Hi neighbors,
I wanted to share something important happening right now in California that affects many of us. A new ballot initiative is working toward the November 2026 election that would exempt homeowners age 60 and older from paying property taxes on their primary residence. The goal is simple: help seniors stay in the homes and communities they helped build. Watch this video summary: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nX3cVamoTcI

You may now be wondering whether this would reduce funding for schools or local services. The initiative is designed to maintain full funding for schools and essential services, without raising taxes on anyone else. 

I invite you to visit exemptpropertytax.com, learn more and if you like it, download the petition today. 

Every signature helps keep our neighbors in their homes and our community strong.

YOUR NAME
​https://exemptpropertytax.com/

Text your friends
There’s an important ballot initiative underway in CA for Nov 2026 that would exempt homeowners age 60+ from paying property taxes on their primary residence—helping seniors stay in the homes and communities they built. This video explains it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nX3cVamoTcI

 It’s designed to protect full funding for schools and essential services, without raising taxes on anyone else. Visit exemptpropertytax.com to learn more, sign, or share.  I am personally involved and would to team up with you.

How to Sign the Petition: Explained Step by Step

PLEASE READ AND FOLLOW THESE INSTRUCTIONS METICULOUSLY.
YOU DO NOT want your packet to be rejected by the Secretary of State by filling the form incorrectly.

VERY IMPORTANT: Any person signing this form needs to be a registered voter of the county the Circulator is circulating the petition in.
The Circulator may not be a resident of the same county (as they can travel county to county to get signatures).
​
​Here are the steps
1) PRINT THE PETITION - scroll up to the top (blue section) for the download link
Reminder: Please register as a volunteer / member here before you sign the petition form

• Do not type in the information.
• You will need to print, DO NOT staple, and submit 1-4 pages (double-sided is ok) by mailing it to the address below. If don't have a printer, email the file to yourself and you can print it at the local library.  You cannot type anything into the form - has to be hand written. And emailing the form doesn't work. YOu will need to mail it.
• If you are the only one signing the form (use black or blue pen only), you will need to fill the Declaration of Circulator i.e you are also the circulator. Note that we prefer you get a few more signatures from your neighbors before mailing it to us. Please do your utmost to collect at least 2 signatures (including yours), and we strongly encourage you to gather many more. 
• ​Whether you collect one signature or many, you must complete the Circulator Declaration section on each petition form. This is required for the signatures to be valid. Each complete petition packet consists of the first 4 pages and can collect up to 2 signatures only. To gather the next 2 signatures, you must print a new full set. A single signature page by itself is not valid and will not be accepted. Be sure to review the “How to Be a Circulator” section on our website for clear instructions and helpful tips.
• We suggest you print the document 5 times in it's entirety so that you collect at least 10 signatures. Each batch of signatures need to have the preceding pages attached. 

2) Review Initiative Text
3) Fill in your county.

• On Page 4, fill in the county that you live in and are registered to vote in.​

All signers must live in that County (circulators can be from another county). If signers live in different counties, they must fill out a separate petition for each signer. It's OK if signers from different homes sign the same petition as long as they are registered in the same county.

💢SIGNATURE GATHERER: OK if YOU do NOT live in the same county as signers.

• Every month the pdf form is updated. Make sure you see the correct month, year. Petition package updated each month
• 💢SIGNATURE GATHERER Print a new one within 7 days of each month. Do NOT alter font size. Print as is. ​

4. Fill in the signature box with your:

• Printed name & Residence Address
• Signature
• City & Zip Code

​5) Fill in the Declaration of Circulator box with your:

• Printed Name & Residence
• AddressDate range in which you obtained your signature(s) (can be the same day)
• Date you executed (signed) the Declaration of Circulator (must be signed last)
• Location of signing
• Signature
  If multiple people in your household/location are signing the same petition, designate one person to be the Circulator after all signatures have been gathered. The execution date must be the last date in the signature-gathering range or later.

6) Mail the completed petition.

• Place the signed petition (all 6 pages) in an envelope and seal securely
• Use 2 Forever® letter stamps for a standard letter envelope. Use 3 Forever® stamps for a “9×12” envelope (add 2 Forever® stamps per additional petition included after the first). 
• Place in outgoing mailbox to the following address:
  Mail to
  California Property Tax Exemption CA2026
  2010 N. 1st Street, Ste 470,
• San Jose 95131
  Make sure all 4 pages of each petition are mailed out (2 signatures on each petition).  
  On the envelope, write the number of signatures contained in the envelope before mailing them out to the address above.
• Email [email protected] once you have mailed the packet out
  ​Subject line of you email: Packet mailed, total signatures collected XYZ
• Why keep it a secret?
  Let others know you’ve taken action. Post on your social media that you just signed the petition — your voice inspires others to step forward too.

QUESTIONS

• Please direct any questions to [email protected] or text 408 805 5993. Do not call please, we are unable to respond due to the volume of emails.
• If you are planning to get more than 2 signatures (multiple signature packets), please read the section below "How to Collect Signatures in Public as our Top Circulator"

How to Collect Signatures in Public Places

To be a circulator in California, you must be 18 years or older and registered to vote in California. When collecting signatures, each set of 4 petition pages can only contain 2 signatures, so always use the full 4-page packet for every 2 people who sign. Do not mix signers from different counties on the same petition form — each packet must contain signatures from only one county. Once completed, stack your packets neatly and mail them back to us by June 10th.

​Watch this video

1. Where to Stand
Circulators typically stand in high-foot-traffic public areas such as:

• Outside grocery stores
• Farmers markets
• Public sidewalks near shopping centers
• Community events
• ​Transit hubs

You must remain on public property (sidewalks, public plazas, parks) — not inside private stores unless you have permission. Stay visible but do not block entrances or walkways.

2. What to Do

• Hold a clipboard and pen
• Politely greet people with a short opener:
• "Hi! Are you a registered California voter?”
  • If yes:
• “We’re gathering signatures to qualify a property tax exemption initiative for seniors 60+. Would you like to sign?”
• ​Keep it short and confident. Smile. Be respectful. Don’t argue. Make sure you read the FAQ

3. How to Respond to QuestionsKeep answers simple and factual.
If they ask what it does:
“It qualifies a ballot initiative to exempt property taxes for homeowners 60 and older on their primary residence. Our website exemptpropertytax.com has the details. Age is the only major criterion.
If they ask if signing means they support it:
“Signing just puts it on the ballot. It allows voters to decide.”
If they ask about schools or Prop 13:
“It keeps Prop 13 protections in place. This initiative focuses on relief for seniors on fixed incomes. Schools will continue to be funded like they are.
If someone disagrees:
“I appreciate your time — have a great day. Please visit our website and get educated”
Never debate. Move on politely.
4. Best Practices

• Be neat and professional.
  Bring multiple 4-page petition packets - printed front and back. Each 4 page set can only collect 2 signatures. 
  Make sure each packet has only one county.
  Double-check that signers fill out all required information.
  Thank every person who signs.

The MindsetYou’re not “selling.”
You’re inviting voters to participate in democracy.

Questions
​Please contact Jack at [email protected]

REQUIRED READING FOR VOLUNTEERS / CIRCULATORS
📝 Volunteer Rules Cheat Sheet for The 60+ Property Tax Exemption Act — Ballot Initiative 25-0035
✅ WHO CAN SIGN

• Must be a registered voter in California
• Must sign using their registered name and address
• Must sign the petition for the county where they are registered

📄 WHAT YOU MUST SHOW EACH SIGNER
Before they sign, you must show:

• ✔️ All pages of the petition document
• ✔️ The required Official Top Funders disclosure

Never cover or hide any part of the petition.

✍️ HOW SIGNERS SHOULD COMPLETE THE FORM

• Write clearly and legibly
• Use their registered residential address (no P.O. boxes)
• Sign and date the petition themselves
• No one may sign for another person

📦 PETITION PACKETS

• Use only official petition forms
• Do not exceed the allowed number of signatures per packet
• Use a new packet when the limit is reached
• Double-sided printing is recommended

⚖️ CIRCULATOR REQUIREMENTS

• Must be 18 years or older
• Must personally witness each signature
• Complete the Circulator Declaration after collecting signatures
• Sign the declaration under penalty of perjury

❌ WHAT NOT TO DO

• Do not collect digital or online or electronic signatures
• Do not alter petition wording
• Do not pre-fill signer information
• Do not pressure or mislead signers
• Do not leave petitions unattended for self-signing

📬 AFTER COLLECTING SIGNATURES

• Review pages for completeness and legibility
• Ensure your circulator declaration is signed
• Return packets according to instructions above

🌐 Resources & Materials
​Visit: exemptpropertytax.com
Download petitions, outreach materials, and instructions.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

1️⃣ What is Ballot Initiative 25-0035? How can I get involved?
Ballot Initiative 25-0035 proposes a property tax exemption for eligible Californians age 60 and older on their primary residence. The goal is to help seniors remain in their homes and reduce displacement caused by rising housing costs.
Visit: exemptpropertytax.com
There you can:

• Download the petition form
• Learn more about the initiative
• Share information with neighbors
• Access outreach materials

2️⃣  Will this affect Prop 13?   
Ballot Initiative 25-0035 does NOT eliminate or change Proposition 13.
Prop 13 remains fully intact,  including the 1% tax cap and annual assessment limits.
What this initiative proposes is an additional exemption layer for eligible homeowners age 60+ on their primary residence. That means:
✔️ Prop 13 protections stay exactly the same
✔️ Property-tax rules under Prop 13 are unchanged
✔️ The initiative simply adds extra relief — similar to how California already provides exemptions for disabled veterans or homeowners
In California, exemptions are common and are administered on top of Prop 13 — not instead of it. We encourage everyone to review the full language and FAQ before drawing conclusions.

2️⃣  Prop 13 reduced funding for schools and local government. This new property tax exemption for the 60+ will reduce funding too?
Despite claims that Prop 13 reduced funding, statewide property-tax revenue rose dramatically:
Late 1970s: roughly $6–7 billion per year (when Prop 13 was passed)
Early 80s: right after Prop 13 passed in 1978, property-tax revenue fell in the short term. 
1990s: Property tax went up to $20 billion+
2010s: about $50–60 billion
Today: well over $90–100 billion annually

Prop 13 protection has helped seniors, but seniors continue to struggle!
What many reports don’t capture is the human cost of rising property taxes — including foreclosures among retirees on fixed incomes. Examples seen in other states show bank repossessions and neglected homes tied to seniors who could no longer keep up with taxes, not mortgages. In high-cost regions like the Bay Area, annual property tax bills of $18,000–$30,000 can push longtime residents toward displacement, even under Prop 13 protections.The concern is that rising tax burdens — especially for retirees — may quietly drive foreclosures, out-migration, and financial stress that traditional fiscal models fail to measure. That's why this exemption plan is critical!

2️⃣ Does this property tax exemption initiative impact Prop 19 or the death tax?
2020’s Prop 19 toppled Prop 58 and the provision to keep your parents’ tax basis when you inherit family property. The title change may reassess the property, which means a HUGE PROPERTY TAX INCREASE for you. #FixProp19, Reinstate 58, Repeal the Death Tax = same movement.
Prop 19 allowed such a reassessment when property is inherited, potentially leading to substantially higher property taxes that, for some heirs, make it difficult to keep family homes. The 60+ Property Tax Exemption does not change inheritance rules or fully resolve that issue. However, it can provide meaningful relief over time — because once heirs themselves reach age 60 and qualify, the exemption could reduce or eliminate the property-tax burden on their primary residence, offering stability even after reassessment.
​Here are three reasons why we need to #FixProp19 and Repeal the Death Tax - visit https://forcalifornians.com/ for details
The Death Tax punishes families twice — after paying taxes their entire lives, Californians are taxed again when passing down their home or savings.
It forces heirs to sell family homes or small businesses just to cover the tax bill, tearing away generational security.
It drives wealth and jobs out of California, discouraging families and entrepreneurs from planting roots in our state.

3️⃣  What about the fiscal impact of such a tax exemption?  
Sacramento’s Legislative Analyst’s Office (LAO) conducted the fiscal analysis and projected a potential $12–$20 billion reduction in property tax revenue. Even at that level, it represents a relatively small share of California’s roughly $100 billion annual property tax base and $350 billion total state budget. However, we do not agree with the LAO’s conclusions — and here’s why:
The LAO estimate relies on static, worst-case assumptions that don’t reflect real-world behavior, economic feedback, or natural eligibility limits among seniors. It presents raw revenue impacts without proper context against California’s $350B budget, $100B property-tax base, or normal budget volatility. The analysis also overlooks offsetting savings from preventing senior displacement, homelessness programs, and fails to account for efficiencies from technology and AI-driven government optimization. In short, it models cost — but not outcomes, savings, or real-world dynamics. Please review the (financial view) op-ed piece on our website exemptpropertytax.com for our complete statement.

BTW - why isn't Sacramento talking about fiscal impacts of the billions in waste?
Why are we paying more taxes while billions go to waste? Here's a CBS report on Sacramento's failures to follow through on audit reports.
$20B+ lost to unemployment fraud, 
$20B+ homelessness spending without accountability,
📄300+ audit fixes still unresolved — lawmakers failed to act on 3 out of 4 recommendations.
These were problems already identified, yet Sacramento keeps talking about new taxes.
👉 Before asking Californians to pay more, Sacramento must show it can manage resources responsibly. ​
Cutting waste, restoring oversight, and bringing fiscal discipline back to government should come first.
Call to Action to correct California's course: 
🚫 No more tax increases until waste is fixed.
🔎 Act on outstanding audit recommendations first.
✂️ Cut fraud, duplication, and broken programs before asking taxpayers to pay more.
⚖️ Accountability first — taxes later.

Schools will not lose funding. California schools are protected by Proposition 98 funding guarantees. When local property tax revenue changes, the state backfills funding through the General Fund. Parcel taxes, bonds, and voter-approved assessments remain unchanged. And property tax will continue to rise - not shrink - clearly demonstrated by the Prop 13 historical view.

4️⃣ Who qualifies for the exemption?
To qualify, a homeowner must:

• Be 60 years of age or older
• Use the property as their primary residence aka exemption does NOT apply to a 2nd home 
• Have lived in California for at least 10 years or owned/occupied the home for 5 consecutive years
  
  Public policy should reflect a person’s ability to pay, not just the paper value of their home. Many long-time homeowners — especially seniors — purchased their homes decades ago when prices were modest, and today’s high valuations often reflect market inflation rather than personal wealth or income. Using property value alone to determine eligibility risks excluding residents who live on fixed or modest incomes despite living in highly appreciated neighborhoods. A fair approach recognizes that rising home values do not necessarily translate into liquid income, and policies should prioritize financial reality over market speculation. Thus, this policy has AGE as the only major criterion.

5️⃣ Does this apply to all property taxes?
No. The exemption applies only to the base property tax on a primary residence.
It does not eliminate voter-approved parcel taxes, bonds, or special assessments.

6️⃣ What is the difference between a signature gatherer and a Circulator. If I am the signature gatherer, who should be the Circulator?
They are the same. Each petition can get signatures from residents of a single county. The circulator can reside in another county. If you are the only one signing the form, you will need to fill the Declaration of Circulator i.e you are also the circulator. 

7️⃣ Why do I need to send all 4 pages with signatures? Didn’t Prop 19 signatures only require one page?
We must follow the California Secretary of State’s rules. This initiative is a state constitutional amendment — unlike Prop 19 — and the full legal text, prepared by an attorney, must be included with every signature packet. All pages are required to ensure compliance and validity.

8️⃣ Seniors are already very affluent. Why do they deserve a break?
 I believe our seniors deserve respect, dignity, and thoughtful consideration — not to be treated as targets or burdens. After a lifetime of work, contribution, and sacrifice, older adults should be able to live their remaining years with stability and peace of mind. Regardless of their circumstances today, their achievements reflect decades of effort, and our policies should honor that reality. As a society, we must remember that every generation will one day reach this stage of life, and how we treat seniors today reflects the values we hold for ourselves tomorrow. Any responsible effort that improves the well-being, security, and comfort of our senior community deserves serious support, especially when it can be achieved without harming the broader public good.

9️⃣ Will this raise taxes on younger residents?
The initiative is designed to help seniors without raising taxes on any group. It seeks to maintain funding for schools and essential services without increasing taxes through cuts to waste and optimization of OpEx. 

🔟  Can you change the age limit?
To make any change, we would need to hit the reset button which would make the signatures collected so far null and void.

1️⃣1️⃣  Why not cut waste, optimize government instead?
The mantra of our elected leaders is to raise taxes first! Before turning to new taxes or raising existing ones, we must first ensure that public spending is transparent, accountable, and delivering measurable results. Californians deserve confidence that every dollar collected is used efficiently and tied to clear outcomes, not simply increased funding without evaluation. Fiscal responsibility requires government to prioritize performance, oversight, and innovation so that we can do more with the resources we already have. I believe effective governance means maximizing impact, reducing waste, and proving value to taxpayers before asking them to contribute more.

In California (and many counties), revenues have increased at roughly twice the rate of inflation while spending has jumped even higher. Until we stop spending like drunken sailors, belt tightening would need to be forced. At some point, enough is enough. No more taxes.

 1️⃣2️⃣ ​Will schools lose funding?
No. California schools are funded through multiple sources, including state backfill, parcel taxes, bond measures, and enrollment-based formulas. The initiative does not change those protections. Existing funding protections, including Proposition 98 guarantees, remain in place - scroll up to read the op-ed piece.

1️⃣3️⃣  Why is this initiative being proposed?
Supporters believe many seniors on fixed incomes face growing housing costs and risk displacement. The initiative aims to promote housing stability, reduce senior homelessness, and allow older residents to age in place.

 1️⃣4️⃣ What is the current status of the initiative?

• Official title and summary language have been issued.
• The initiative is currently in the signature-gathering phase.
• Approximately one million valid signatures are needed to qualify for the November 2026 ballot.
• Signature deadline: June 25, 2026.
• Upon qualification, this will be on the November 2026 ballot.

1️⃣5️⃣ Who can sign the petition?
Any voter registered in California may sign the petition. There is no age criterion.
Signers must provide the same name and address used on their voter registration.

1️⃣6️⃣  How do I dispel the myths and lay out the facts?
Scroll down

​✅ Myths vs. Facts — 60+ Property Tax Exemption Act (Initiative 25-0035)

MYTH: This initiative will raise taxes on younger homeowners.
FACT: The proposal is designed to maintain funding for schools and essential services without increasing taxes on any group. It reallocates resources while keeping existing protections in place.

MYTH: Schools will lose funding.
FACT: California schools are protected by Proposition 98 funding guarantees. When local property tax revenue changes, the state backfills funding through the General Fund. Parcel taxes, bonds, and voter-approved assessments remain unchanged.

MYTH: This eliminates all local taxes on homes.
FACT: The exemption applies only to the base property tax on a qualifying primary residence. Special taxes, parcel taxes, and bond repayments still apply.

MYTH: Everyone over 60 automatically qualifies.
FACT: The home must be a primary residence, and the homeowner must meet residency or ownership requirements outlined in the initiative.

MYTH: California can’t afford this.
FACT: Supporters argue the exemption represents a small portion of the state’s overall budget and may reduce long-term costs by helping prevent senior displacement and homelessness.

MYTH: This is a radical or untested idea.
FACT: Many states across the country already provide forms of property tax relief for seniors, and California voters have a long history of approving voter-driven property tax reforms.

In The News

Patch - here (this one went viral)
ABC10 Sacramento – here
ABC 7 - Los Angeles 
AM1300 Los Angeles
​Yahoo News - here
National Today - here
WRE News - here
CLTA eNews - here
Sierra Daily News - here
Crescent City Times - here
creaders.net

CBS8 - San Diego - here
Sacramento Bee - here
The Observer - here
MSN - here
Secret Los Angeles - here
The Hemet & San Jacinto Chronicle - here
National Today - here
World Journal
腾讯 (Téngxùn) Tencent News
Xiaohongshu (RED) app
Metro News-Koreatown

• CHRONOLOGY
• DEVIL'S IN THE DETAILS
• ENDORSEMENTS
• 16 STATES
• BALLOT TITLE

<

>

 Chronology of the 60+ Property Tax Exemption Initiative (#25-0035)

1️⃣ November 6, 2025 — Amendment language drafted and submitted to the Office of Legislative Counsel (Sacramento) for review.
2️⃣ November 26, 2025 — Office of Legislative Counsel completed its review and updates to the amendment language.
3️⃣ December 2, 2025 — Final amendment language accepted by the State Attorney General; Initiative #25-0035 officially assigned.
4️⃣ December 8, 2025 — Initial meeting held with the Legislative Analyst’s Office to discuss the initiative and address their questions.
5️⃣ January 21, 2026 — The Legislative Analyst’s Office completed the financial analysis and submitted its report to the Attorney General.
6️⃣ February 5, 2026 — The Attorney General prepared the official legal title and summary and submitted it to the Secretary of State.
7️⃣ February 5, 2026 — The Secretary of State cleared the initiative for circulation.
8️⃣ February 7, 2026 — First volunteer/circulator began - signature collection statewide gets going.
9️⃣ June 24, 2026 — Deadline to obtain 876,641 petition signatures  and submit to the Secretary of State
🔟  August 4, 2026 — Qualification deadline to get on the November 3, 2026 election ballot

​Additional explanation below will help you get through the steps to complete the signing of your petition

STEP 1:
Write the full name of the county you live in. No abbreviations.

STEP 2

• NOT SURE NAME/ADDRESS AS REGISTERED TO VOTE then check voterstatus.sos.ca.gov.

• Each signer must handwrite their own info. No Mr. Lee writes in Mrs. Lee's info. (If handicap include posit note why you wrote the information for them. Ex. They are blind, They are 98 years old. Then put your name, contact info.)
• If you make a mistake don't cross it out!  Write in the correct answer next to the mistake.
• 1 signer per signer box. NO Mr. and Mrs. Lee in 1 box.
• Must keep your writing in the box. If you pass the margins the Auditor may invalidate your signature.
• Reminders. Mike vs. Michael? Married - update your new name? Have you moved? Did you update your new voting address with the Elections Office? Not sure if you included your middle name- better to write more info than less.
• QUESTIONS? If they wrote their Zip above "City" it's OK. If they wrote their address above "Print Address." It's OK. They can put their name and signature in the line below. OK to add info but NOT cross out info.
• The Election Auditor is looking for enough information to determine if the signature belongs to the correct person. Wrong placement may not invalidate. Illegibly writing may invalidate. If we can't understand what you wrote, neither will the Auditor.​

​​STEP 3

• Declaration of Collector section: Print your name, address, city and zip
• YES, even if you wrote it in STEP 2, this is a different section. You are providing an affidavit that you “witnessed” your own signature (and other signers - if they are on your petition.) Prefer no abbreviations. STATE -OK to write CA. 
• It is OK for you to be your own "witness" and fill in the Declaration of Collector.
• FIRST DATE = Signer #1 what date did they sign.
• END DATE = Last signer what date did they sign. 
• OK if both dates are the same: There is only one signer. All signers signed same day.
• OK if both dates are different: Signer #1 signed Sunday. Last signer signed Monday.
• OK if you have only one signer. 
• What is the month?, day?, year?, street address?, city?, state? that YOU are physically in when you finish the DC.
• This date can be the same as the “end date” OR any date after, BUT NEVER BEFORE the "end date."
• Did you finish signing at home? At a restaurant? Church? THEN USE THAT ADDRESS for the final line. OK if there is not enough room and you need to write below that.

STEP 4
 Your signature.

• YES, in some cases you will write your home address 3 TIMES on the petition.
• Once, if you fill in the signature box. Twice, when you fill in the DC. Thrice, if you finish signing in your home, you need to write it all again on the final line of the petition. This is California law.
• DC examples here. 
• 💢SIGNATURE GATHERER You must write YOUR name and address.
  
  Only petition page needs to be printed and returned if you Print Your Own.
• OK to make multiple photocopies of the unaltered original petition.
• NOTHING is pre printed, nothing printed on the back = invalid.
• Print from a PDF. Do NOT print with URL, time and date marks.
• Select fit to print and do a test print first. Don't shrink it. 
  
  DO NOT:
• Do NOT alter size or margins - 1 inch blank space must be on top.
• fill in Declaration of Circulator and then make photocopies thinking you'll save time by not hand writing. ALL OF THEM ARE INVALID.
• type IN YOUR Declaration of Circulator, save it, press print when you need more. ALL OF THEM ARE INVALID.
• 💢Signature Gatherer print Official Top Funders sheet every month.
  
  If no printer
• FedEx location pay to print.
• UPS location pay to print.
• Libraries some print for free​

Minor Criteria (Procedural / Conditions) for eligibility if you are asked:

• File application
• Provide documentation
• Renew every 5 years
• No commercial portion
• Expires upon sale or relocation
• Does not apply to special taxes/bonds

ENDORSEMENTS

Could you please ask your elected leader(s) to endorse this ballot initiative? City councilmembers, supervisors, assemblymembers and senators.
Here is a suggested draft

SUBJECT: Request for Your Endorsement: Senior Property Tax Exemption Initiative
Dear [Title and Name],
I’m writing as a constituent to ask for your support and endorsement of the 60+ Property Tax Exemption ballot initiative (Initiative 25-0035). This initiative, targeted for the November 2026 election, would exempt eligible homeowners age 60 and older from paying property taxes on their primary residence, helping seniors on fixed incomes remain in the homes and communities they helped build.

The measure is designed to maintain full funding for schools and essential services, without raising taxes on anyone else, while addressing the growing challenge of senior displacement and homelessness. Your endorsement would mean a great deal to seniors and families across our community.
You can learn more at https://exemptpropertytax.com, and submit an endorsement through this link

Thank you for your time and for your continued service.

Sincerely,
[Your Name]
[City / District]

LIST OF ENDORSEMENTS SO FAR (we started this effort just recently, on February 5, 2026)

Kansen Chu, Assemblymember (former)
Jose Esteves, Mayor of Milpitas (former)
Liz Lawler, Mayor of Monte Sereno (former)
Rowena Turner, Mayor of Monte Sereno (former)
Jim Davis, Vice Mayor of Sunnyvale (former)
​Rishi Kumar, former candidate for Congress CA-16​
William Lam, Councilmember, Milpitas
Margaret Brown, President, Retired Public Employees Association

16 States have Done it. Property Tax Reform is Sweeping the Nation

Across the country, states are already conducting property tax reform—while California has lagged behind, even as the exodus hurts it's future. By the next census, Some projections suggest California could lose more than one congressional seat by the next census — potentially as many as two to five — if current population trends continue.

Senior Property Tax Relief in Place

• Colorado – Seniors 65+ can exempt 50% of the first $200,000 in value on their primary residence.
• Illinois (Cook County) – Senior Freeze Exemption locks in assessed value for seniors 65+ with income ≤ $65,000.
• New York State – Localities can reduce assessments up to 50% for seniors 65+, with income thresholds.
• Tennessee – Senior Property Tax Freeze program locks in tax rates for eligible seniors on their primary residence.
• Missouri – Counties may freeze property taxes for primary residences of seniors 62+; state eliminated income tax on Social Security/pensions.
• Washington – Exemptions for seniors, retired due to disability, and disabled veterans, based on income.
• Florida – The Florida House passed a proposal to let voters vote to eliminate most homestead property taxes.
• Texas – Expanded homestead exemption (up to $100K–$140K), with extra relief for seniors and disabled homeowners.

 Proposed / Currently in Process

• Michigan (SB 292) – Proposes a senior property tax exemption for principal residences
• New York (Bills S5175A, S4586) – Expanding exemptions and allowing freezes for seniors in large cities with income caps.
• Oregon (HB 3755) – Would grant exemptions to seniors 65+ with incomes ≤ $150K, phased in over time.
• Ohio (SB 206, Patton’s Bill) – Seeks a 50% reduction or freeze in property taxes for seniors 65+.
• Washington (SB 5020, Volz Bill) – Pushes to exempt or freeze assessments for seniors 75+ or disabled veterans.
• Kentucky – Proposed constitutional amendment to freeze property valuations for seniors 65+.
• South Dakota - Gov. Larry Rhoden has proposed allowing individual counties the option to decide to replace property taxes with a half-cent sales tax increase
• Texas - Considering eliminating property taxes
• ​Wyoming - They are considering a bill that would set the taxable value of (statewide) residential property to 0%. Virginia followed this same exact approach to exempt veterans.
• Indiana - Proposal to phase out tangible property taxes and eliminate them long term.
• North Dakota - Citizen-driven efforts exploring elimination or major reductions.
• Kansas — long-term proposal to eliminate property taxes graduall
  ​

Title and Summary of the Ballot Initiative as approved by the Attorney General

February 5, 2026
Initiative 25-0035
The Attorney General of California has prepared the following title and summary of the chief purpose and points of the proposed measure:
EXEMPTS CERTAIN HOMEOWNERS AGED 60 OR OLDER FROM PROPERTY TAXES. INITIATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT. Reduces local property tax revenues by exempting a principal residence from property taxes if the homeowner, or the homeowner’s spouse: (1) is 60 years of age or older; and (2) has occupied the home as a principal residence for five consecutive years or has lived in California for at least 10 years. Exemption terminates if property no longer qualifies as a principal residence. After five years, homeowners must certify their continued eligibility to maintain exemption. Exemption does not apply to voter-approved special taxes, assessments, or bonds. Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local governments: Many homeowners ages 60 or older would pay lower property taxes. This would reduce revenue for local governments and schools by $12 billion to $20 billion per year. These losses would grow over time. (25-0035.)

• ADDRESS TO SEND A CHECK
• ADDRESS TO MAIL PETITION
• CONTACT US
• PRESS RELEASE
• BEST IMAGE

<

>

Thank you for sending us a check

(Make the check out to California Property Tax Exemption CA2026"
California Property Tax Exemption CA2026 
4950 Hamilton Avenue, Suite 108
San Jose CA 95129
Suggested amount is $100+

Mail Signature Packet Envelopes to

(Make sure the Circulator Declaration section is signed before you seal the envelope)
California Property Tax Exemption CA2026
2010 N. 1st Street, Ste 470,
​San Jose 95131

Press Release March 3, 2026 

Please see the press release below regarding California’s 60+ Property Tax Exemption Act of 2026 and its progress toward the November 2026 ballot. Proponent Rishi Kumar is available for interviews regarding the initiative and the broader national trend toward property tax reform.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
March 3, 2026
Media Contact:
Ray Froess
Director of Media Relations
California Property Tax Exemption CA2026 — FPPC #1485201
408-805-5993
[email protected]
http://ExemptPropertyTax.com

California Joins the National Momentum for Property Tax Reform as 60+ Exemption Initiative Advances Toward 2026 Ballot

SANTA CLARA COUNTY, Calif. -- The California Property Tax Exemption CA2026 Ballot Initiative Committee today highlighted growing national momentum for property tax reform, citing recent legislative action in Florida and reform efforts underway in at least 16 states.
The Florida House recently voted to advance a proposal allowing voters to consider eliminating certain non-school property taxes, reflecting broader discussions nationwide about property tax relief.
California’s 60+ Property Tax Exemption Act of 2026, filed with the Attorney General on Dec. 2, 2025, is currently in the signature-gathering phase and progressing toward the November 2026 ballot. More than 1,000 volunteers and circulators across all 58 California counties are supporting the effort.
Rishi Kumar, a former Saratoga city councilmember and executive board member of the California Democratic Party, said seniors deserve stability. “After a lifetime of work and contribution, older adults deserve the peace of mind that comes with remaining in their homes. This exemption represents a critical step toward protecting seniors.”
Recent reporting by CBS News highlighted 300+ unresolved State Auditor recommendations, with lawmakers failing to act on three out of four audit fixes. The report highlighted state-level fiscal challenges, including unemployment fraud losses and homelessness spending concerns tied to accountability issues.

California operates on an annual budget of approximately $350 billion and collects roughly $100 billion in property tax revenue each year. According to the Legislative Analyst’s Office, the proposed exemption represents an estimated $12–$20 billion annually — about six percent of the state budget. Supporters note that the analysis reflects a static modeling approach and does not account for potential long-term savings associated with preventing senior displacement and homelessness. The financial analysis and additional context are available on the campaign’s website.
The initiative has received coverage from outlets including Patch, ABC10 Sacramento, ABC7 Los Angeles, AM1300 Los Angeles, CBS8 San Diego, The Sacramento Bee, The Observer, MSN, Yahoo News, National Today, WRE News, CLTA eNews, Sierra Daily News, Crescent City Times, CReaders.net, Secret Los Angeles, The Hemet & San Jacinto Chronicle, World Journal, Tencent News, the Xiaohongshu (RED) platform, and Metro News in Koreatown.
About the 60+ Property Tax Exemption Act of 2026
The 60+ Property Tax Exemption Act of 2026 is a statewide ballot initiative designed to help California seniors remain in their homes while maintaining funding for schools and essential services, without raising taxes for other residents.
For more information, visit http://ExemptPropertyTax.com.
###

Post this image on your social media today

Social Media Posts To Share

​The 60+ Property Tax Exemption Ballot Initiative is looking for volunteers to help make history — a movement to put money back into the pockets of people and seniors who need it most. Join our grassroots team to protect seniors, cut waste, and keep Californians in their homes.
​Sign up today and be part of real change — your voice and effort matter! 

Please take a moment to review the FAQ tab above so you’re fully informed and confident when answering questions. Use snippets from the op-ed pieces below to add to your points.

---

Why do Seniors Deserve this Property Tax Exemption? And what about the deficit?
​Watch this video

Op-Ed | Opinion Piece: California Seniors Built This State. It’s Time to Let Them Stay in Their Homes.

California’s seniors built our communities, paid into our systems for decades, and helped make this state what it is today. Yet too many now live with a quiet fear: that rising property taxes will force them out of the very homes they worked their entire lives to keep.

That fear is real—and it is growing. Which is why Ballot Initiative 25-0035, likely to appear on the November 2026 ballot, matters so deeply.
The initiative would exempt eligible Californians age 60 and older from paying property taxes on their primary residence, with age as the sole major qualification. It has received official title and summary language from California’s Attorney General, completed its fiscal analysis, and is now in the signature-gathering phase. Supporters are collecting signatures statewide, with a June 25, 2026 deadline to qualify for the ballot. Details are available at ExemptPropertyTax.com.

This is more than a policy proposal—it is a turning point.
We cannot keep taxing seniors into the street. This initiative represents the greatest property-tax relief for seniors since Proposition 13, and it is a major tool in the fight against senior homelessness. It offers a path forward that protects seniors’ homes, their retirement savings, and their peace of mind.
The Attorney General approved the initiative’s language on February 5, 2026, marking the start of a familiar, voter-driven process that Californians have used before to enact historic reforms—including Proposition 13 itself. Once approximately one million valid signatures are collected and verified by the Secretary of State, the measure will go before voters in November 2026.

Understandably, some ask: If seniors are exempted from property taxes, will taxes go up for younger residents—or will funding for schools be cut?
The answer is no.

Our plan maintains full funding for schools and essential services, without raising taxes on any group. Even after the exemption, California would continue to operate with a surplus. Schools remain protected through state backfill under Proposition 98, voter-approved parcel taxes, bond measures, and enrollment-based funding formulas. This initiative does not touch those protections.

Across the country, states are already moving in this direction—while California has lagged behind. Sixteen states have enacted or advanced senior property tax relief. Washington and Colorado have led the way. Wyoming is considering setting the taxable value of residential property for seniors to zero percent. Virginia has taken a similar approach for veterans. New York Governor Kathy Hochul has initiated senior property tax reform. The question is no longer whether this can be done—it’s why California hasn’t acted yet.

The stakes could not be clearer. California has spent $24 billion on homelessness since 2019, yet homelessness has still increased by more than 30,000 people. Seniors now account for nearly half of single homeless adults, and 41% experience homelessness for the first time after age 50, often due to lost income and rising housing costs. Senior homelessness has increased 84% in just four years.

Preventing displacement is not just compassionate—it is fiscally smart. The state spends roughly $160,000 per homeless senior over five years. Preventing even a fraction of those cases generates massive savings. In fact, keeping seniors housed through a modest property tax exemption can return up to ten times the investment by avoiding crisis-driven medical, shelter, and social-service costs.

Public policy should protect stability for residents who have already put down roots in their communities. Raising property taxes on homeowners — especially retirees living on fixed incomes — can force people out of familiar neighborhoods, support systems, and lifelong homes. Keeping taxes stable for seniors helps preserve community continuity, reduces displacement, and supports mental and emotional well-being by allowing older residents to age in place. Responsible tax policy should prioritize housing security and predictability, not policies that unintentionally push longtime Californians out of the state.​

There is also a powerful economic upside. A senior property tax exemption puts money back into local communities—where seniors spend it on small businesses, home services, restaurants, and care providers. Instead of disappearing into bureaucracy, those dollars circulate locally, strengthening our economy and supporting jobs. It is a pro-growth reform that benefits everyone.

Proposition 13 was a godsend when voters approved it in 1978, allowing countless seniors to remain in their homes. Now it is time to build on that proven foundation and move forward—by exempting Californians age 60 and over from property tax payments on their primary residence.

California cannot afford to stay stuck in the past. Seniors who built this state deserve stability, dignity, and the right to age in place. Ballot Initiative 25-0035 is a bold, responsible step in that direction—and one that California voters deserve the chance to decide.
​
We are forging ahead. And this time, California should lead.

The Financial Angle: Op-Ed Piece

California’s Property Tax Reform Is Finally Within Reach. 
California is no stranger to large budgets, large debates, and large numbers. But when it comes to property taxes—particularly for seniors on fixed incomes—the conversation has remained frozen for decades. It’s time for change! 

Ballot Initiative 25-0035 - that will likely be on the November 2026 ballot - would exempt eligible Californians age 60 and older from paying property taxes on their primary residence. Age is the only major criteria. The initiative has received official title and summary language and a fiscal analysis and is currently in the signature-gathering phase. Supporters are collecting signatures statewide to qualify the measure for the November 2026 ballot. The deadline to submit signatures is June 25, 2026. Find the details at https://exemptpropertytax.com/

To understand why this exemption is needed, we must start with scale and context, which are often missing from this debate. California operates on an annual budget of roughly $350 billion and collects about $100 billion each year in property taxes. The proposed senior property tax exemption would reallocate less than 6% of the state’s total budget--$12-$20 billion as per the Legislative Analyst’s Office (LAO)—while keeping schools and local services whole.

Any shortfall could easily be made up by cuts to waste and budget optimization. Offset by eliminating fraud too. These figures are commonly cited by critics, auditors, and policy analysts. Here are examples of Government Waste / Cost Overruns in California:

• 300+ audit fixes still unresolved — lawmakers failed to act on 3 out of 4 recommendations.
• Homelessness Spending: California has spent $24 billion since 2019 without accountability
• California High-Speed Rail Cost Overruns,: Original voter-approved estimate (2008): ~$33 billion, Current projected cost: ~$135 billion
• Unemployment Benefits: Estimated fraud during pandemic:  $31 billion
• Prison Overtime: California Department of Corrections overtime reportedly exceeding $1B annually in some years
• Oakland Police: Overtime spending indicate ~$236 million spent on overtime since 2008. 
• San Francisco Police: Overtime spending grew from $52.9M → $108.4M over five years.
  
  ​Note that the billionaire tax has depleted California's annual revenue by $16 billion already (as of Feb 14, 2026)

This is not a state-budget-breaking number—especially in a state that routinely experiences $10–$30 billion year-to-year budget swings, and that has spent more than $24 billion on homelessness since 2019 with little to show for it. Clearly, continuing to fund crises after the fact is not working.

Critics often point to this $12–$20 billion annual revenue impact estimate from LAO. That estimate deserves careful examination—not because it is fabricated, but because it reflects worst-case, static modeling, not real-world implementation.

More importantly, the LAO analysis relies on assumptions that potentially inflate projected costs. It assumes high participation rates, no behavioral change, no economic feedback effects, and static government spending. It does not model the real dynamics that shape outcomes: not all eligible seniors apply immediately,, and others exit eligibility through relocation, sale, or death. These natural limits matter—and they are not accounted for.
The analysis also omits what matters most: offsetting savings.

Preventing senior displacement reduces reliance on emergency healthcare, Medi-Cal long-term care, county crisis services, and homelessness interventions. It also reduces the number of seniors pushed prematurely into the rental market, where housing costs and public assistance demands are often higher. These savings are real, not theoretical. California already knows the cost of inaction—and it is enormous.

Another critical omission is the absence of contextual scaling. The report presents raw losses without situating them against a $100 billion property tax base, a $350 billion annual budget, or the state’s normal budget volatility. Numbers without context distort judgment and fuel unnecessary fear.

Schools are understandably the most politically sensitive part of this discussion, and here too clarity matters. When the LAO states that roughly half of the projected revenue shift “hits schools,” it is describing where the money would have come from, not what schools would ultimately receive.

California schools are not funded by property taxes alone. Under Proposition 98, schools are guaranteed minimum funding levels. When local property tax revenue fluctuates, the state is legally required to backfill the difference using General Fund dollars. Voter-approved parcel taxes and school bond measures are explicitly exempt from the proposed exemption and remain fully intact. School funding is also driven by enrollment-based formulas, not just local tax collections.
Importantly, the LAO does not say that schools would lose funding in absolute terms. It does not say that Proposition 98 guarantees would be broken. And it does not say that classrooms would see fewer dollars.

Finally, the analysis fails to account for a reality that is reshaping every sector of the economy: optimization through technology and artificial intelligence. If AI is transforming productivity across the private sector—from software to finance to healthcare—it is reasonable to expect the public sector to realize meaningful efficiencies as well. Ignoring this trend assumes a future of permanent inefficiency, which is neither realistic nor acceptable.

At its core, this policy is about people. More than 9 million Californians are age 60 or older. Many live on fixed incomes. They are not speculators. They are long-time residents who built communities, paid taxes for decades, and now face rising costs disconnected from their ability to pay. They deserve stability, dignity, and the peace of mind that comes from being able to remain in their homes.
​
There are many taxes that deserve examination. But property tax reform is the issue moving now. Allowing this reform a few years to work will show whether prevention can outperform crisis spending—and whether California can lead with pragmatism rather than paralysis.
California has the resources to do this. What it needs now is the discipline to prioritize outcomes, embrace responsible reform, and let thoughtful policy prove itself.

Californians are watching policies strain local budgets and push some cities and counties toward financial distress — raising serious questions about long-term fiscal stability.

California Budget Position 
“A $45B+ surplus in 2022 shifted to a projected $68B deficit by 2024-25, driven largely by rapid spending growth and expanded rebates. The contrast becomes even clearer when comparing total state and local government spending from all sources — California spends roughly $17,000 per resident, while Texas and Florida average closer to $10,000 today. These trends raise serious questions about long-term sustainability.
Many Californians feel the state is drifting toward a ‘tax-and-spend’ culture without enough voices calling for fiscal balance and long-term accountability.

​It’s time to tighten the belt — and targeted tax relief, paired with responsible spending, can help stop the financial bleed, restore balance, and slow the exodus of families and businesses from California.

Here's another op-ed piece that will shed some light on how we can consider approaches to cut waste in government and build an optimal engagement model for constituent services.. 

The Policy Rationale Behind a 60+ Property Tax Exemption

Executive SummaryA property tax exemption for homeowners aged 60 and over is designed to address the financial, social, and health-related challenges faced by older adults living on fixed or limited incomes. As housing costs continue to rise across California, many seniors experience growing difficulty maintaining stable housing. This paper outlines the underlying policy rationale for a senior property tax exemption, including its goals, expected benefits, and the broader implications for households, communities, and public systems.

The central principle behind such a policy is straightforward: enabling older adults to age in place supports family stability, community cohesion, and improved health outcomes while helping prevent involuntary displacement. Seniors have contributed to local tax bases for decades and rely on predictable housing costs in retirement. A structured exemption recognizes these contributions while supporting long-term social and economic stability.

IntroductionProperty-tax exemptions for adults aged 60 and above are grounded in the need to provide financial relief to older residents who face rising costs but often have stagnant income. Many seniors rely on retirement sources such as pensions, Social Security, or modest savings that do not increase at the same pace as property taxes. As valuations and tax obligations grow, seniors may experience financial strain, prompting discussions about policy mechanisms to promote stability and prevent displacement.

Objectives of a 60+ Property Tax ExemptionHelping Seniors Remain in Their HomesA key objective is enabling older adults to continue living in their homes. Stability in housing supports independence and security, particularly for individuals who may have lived in the same residence for decades. An exemption reduces financial pressure and mitigates the risk that rising property taxes force seniors to relocate.
Protection for Fixed-Income HouseholdsProperty taxes often increase faster than cost-of-living adjustments. For seniors whose income does not rise proportionately, tax burdens can become unsustainable. Exemptions allow limited income to be allocated toward essential needs such as healthcare, food, medication, and utilities.

Preventing DisplacementRapid economic growth and rising property valuations can unintentionally displace long-term residents. A senior exemption acts as a buffer against the economic forces that could otherwise push older adults out of their communities and away from familiar support structures.
Supporting Community ContinuityLong-time residents strengthen neighborhood cohesion. Their ongoing presence contributes to local engagement, volunteerism, community memory, and intergenerational stability. Reducing involuntary mobility helps preserve these benefits.
Acknowledging Long-Term ContributionsMany seniors have contributed to local education systems, infrastructure investments, and public services through decades of property-tax payments. Offering relief in later years recognizes this long-standing support.

Why Aging in Place MattersStability and FamiliarityA long-term home provides predictable routines and familiar surroundings that support cognitive and emotional well-being. For older adults, especially those managing early memory decline, maintaining a known environment can reduce stress and confusion.

Emotional and Psychological HealthRemaining in one’s home reinforces personal identity and dignity. Research shows lower rates of depression and improved emotional health among seniors who maintain their residential stability.
Social and Community NetworksOlder residents often depend on local relationships built over many years—neighbors, small businesses, community groups, and places of worship. These networks form an informal safety net that can support daily needs and reduce isolation.
Health and Safety ConsiderationsRelocation is physically and emotionally challenging for many older adults. Adjusting to new layouts and unfamiliar environments may increase the risk of falls, disrupt medication routines, and elevate stress levels. Studies indicate higher hospitalization rates soon after senior relocation.

Financial PredictabilityFor many seniors, a paid-off home offers stable monthly costs. Moving often involves higher rent or mortgage costs, new utility deposits, and other up-front expenses that can erode retirement savings.
Improved Long-Term Health OutcomesResearch indicates that seniors who age in place often maintain greater independence, experience better health outcomes, and may delay or reduce the need for institutional care. These outcomes also benefit families and community support systems.
​
Consequences of Senior DisplacementPsychological ImpactsLosing a long-term home can be associated with anxiety, grief, and emotional distress. Involuntary relocation disrupts stability and may impact mental health significantly.

Loss of Support SystemsDisplacement can sever ties with neighbors, nearby family, and healthcare providers. Loss of these support structures may increase social isolation, which is linked to negative health outcomes and higher mortality risk.

Physical Health RisksRelocation stress is correlated with increased hospitalization rates among seniors. Navigating a new environment may also increase vulnerability to accidents or disorientation.

Financial StrainRelocating often introduces higher costs, potentially depleting retirement income. Increased housing expenses can create long-term financial instability.

Broader Community EffectsCommunities benefit from retaining long-time residents. When seniors are displaced, neighborhoods lose historical knowledge, volunteer contributions, and intergenerational relationships that contribute to social resilience.

ConclusionA property tax exemption for residents aged 60 and above addresses several interconnected policy goals: stabilizing senior housing, supporting those on fixed income, reducing displacement risk, and recognizing decades of contribution to community systems. Aging in place is associated with improved health, emotional well-being, and community continuity. Understanding these dynamics provides insight into the broader value of supporting seniors in maintaining stable housing during later stages of life.
 Compelling Data – why we need this policy in California Seniors and Homelessness in California

Homelessness still remains a top concern in the Bay Area. In a recent poll,  75% of those responding said they were “very concerned” or “somewhat concerned.”
​
Older adults — defined as 50+ or 55+ — are among the fastest growing groups entering homelessness in California.
https://justiceinaging.org/california-older-renters-unaffordability-homelessness/
A recent statewide study found that among single homeless adults in CA, 48% are age 50 or older.
https://bcsh.ca.gov/calich/meetings/materials/20230907_study_homelessness.pdf
Among homeless older adults, 41% reported their first experience of homelessness after age 50.
https://bcsh.ca.gov/calich/meetings/materials/20230907_study_homelessness.pdf
In a span from 2017 to 2021, the number of older adults accessing homelessness services increased by ~84%, despite the overall senior population growing only about 7%.
https://calmatters.org/health/2023/02/california-homeless-seniors/
These statistics show a clear upward trend in senior homelessness, and that a significant share of homelessness in California now involves older adults.

How to Collect Signatures in Public as a Circulator who collects multiple signatures

---

---

"Rather than watching taxpayer dollars disappear into government inefficiency, we should be putting that money back into the hands of seniors."

Contribute Link

PAYPAL

Click below

CONTACT US

The proponent of ballot initiative 25-0035
Subscribe to our mailing list 
Ballotpedia Link 
Our top Donors - here 

The Property Tax Exemption Act of 2026 
​Phone: (408) 805-5993 (DO NOT CALL please. We respond to text messages) | [email protected] 
Sign-up to volunteer here
Sign-the petition: Details here 

• Mail signature packet envelopes to:
  (Make sure the Circulator Declaration section is signed before you seal the envelope)
  California Property Tax Exemption CA2026
  2010 N. 1st Street, Ste 470,
  ​San Jose 95131
  
  Mailing a check? Here's the address:
  (Make the check out to California Property Tax Exemption CA2026"
  California Property Tax Exemption CA2026 
  4950 Hamilton Avenue, Suite 108
  San Jose CA 95129
  Suggested amount is $100+

It's time to exempt the 60+ age group from property tax payments. Let's get it done! 
We never sell our visitors' personal information!
​Copyright 2026 | California Property Tax Exemption CA2026
Paid for by California Property Tax Exemption CA2026 || FPPC # 1485201 || 41-2657087

This website uses marketing and tracking technologies. Opting out of this will opt you out of all cookies, except for those needed to run the website. Note that some products may not work as well without tracking cookies.

Opt Out of Cookies

PAID FOR BY California Property Tax Exemption CA2026  FPPC # 1485201

Privacy Policy. Website Warning. Use content at one's own risk. We will not be held liable or responsible for use of site or any damages suffered as a result of content. Not responsible for Google translation. Please check with a native speaker. ExemptPropertyTax.com does not sell your information. Ballot Initiative Number 25-0035
All Rights Reserved. Nonpartisan All Volunteers. COPYRIGHT©2026